Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jonas Trinker vs Marco Bergagnin Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Trinker vs Bergagnin analysis and find out who is favored!
Jonas Trinker vs Marco Bergagnin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Trinker 1 - 0 Bergagnin
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Trinker has won 43.48% of points on their second serve, while Bergagnin has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Trinker, in recent form, has won 56.54% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bergagnin has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.17% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Trinker has saved 51.16% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bergagnin has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Trinker has won 47.83% of matches played (W/L 22/ 24), with Bergagnin winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Trinker has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 63/ 50), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 123/ 120). Bergagnin has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Trinker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48.89% of matches (W/L 22/ 23), where as Bergagnin has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Trinker winning 1 times and Bergagnin being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Trinker winning 2 and Bergagnin winning 1. The last match between Trinker and Bergagnin was at the Croatia F4, 21-03-2016, Q1 round, Clay with Jonas Trinker getting the victory 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Trinker and Bergagnin have played a deciding set 1 times, with Trinker winning 1 times and Bergagnin 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Trinker winning 0, and Bergagnin 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Trinker has played against opponents with an average rank of 127.17 while Bergagnin has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Trinker has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bergagnin has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Trinker has converted 44.68% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bergagnin has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
861
Rank
755
High
28
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
32
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
52% (209-190)
Career Total W/L
10% (1-9)
60% (9-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jonas Trinker | Marco Bergagnin |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jonas Trinker | Marco Bergagnin |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (9/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (18/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (166/156) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 40 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 38 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:23:48 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 68.27 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (457/779) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (300/457) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (140/322) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (42/94) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (344/778) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 60% (9/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (9/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (6/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Jonas Trinker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Conor Gannon
Player
Jonas Trinker
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jonas Trinker
Player
Valeriy Martishev
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Jonas Trinker
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jonas Trinker
Player
Duje Markovina
58%
(
52 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
60 of
105)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
105)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Eero Vasa
Player
Jonas Trinker
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jonas Trinker
Player
Patrick Kaukovalta
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
52 of
93)
9
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
9
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jonas Trinker
Player
Nikos Lehmann
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jonas Trinker
Player
Melvin Kumar
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jonas Trinker
Player
Ivan Perez Martin
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
82%
(
42 of
51)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jonas Trinker
Player
Carl Sjoholm
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Marco Bergagnin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 4-6 6-2 10-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniele Valentino
Player
Marco Bergagnin
80%
(
75 of
94)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
105)
1
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
7
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
96
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adelchi Virgili
Player
Marco Bergagnin
50%
(
39 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Pre-Q | 7-5 1-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eduardo Dischinger
Player
Marco Bergagnin
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
4
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
16%
(
8 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktor Troicki
Player
Marco Bergagnin
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
70)
3
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
5
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ariel Behar
Player
Marco Bergagnin
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Trinker Vs Bergagnin Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
